>> VERSION FRANÇAISE   
ISSUE N°20
FEBRUARY 2006

C O N T E N T S
OF THE ISSUE

white cube Editorial
white cube Parliamentary Conference on the WTO
white cube World Summit on the Information Society
white cube Women in politics
white cube Cooperation with
the UN

white cube Regional Seminars
white cube Recent publications
white cube Technical cooperation update
white cube Parliamentary developments
white cube Read in the press

Previous issue Other issues
of the Review

Next issue

ALSO ON THIS SITE

white cube What is the IPU?
white cube What's new?
white cube Press Releases
white cube Publications
white cube PARLINE database
white cube PARLIT database
white cube Feedback
white cube Quick Search

The World of Parliaments
Regional Seminars

AFRICAN PARLIAMENTARIANS TURN TO THE PAST TO ENSURE A BRIGHTER FUTURE

Hope Why address the scars of the past? Many African countries coming out of conflict face poverty and other daunting challenges that require immediate and effective action. A serious consideration of the past may therefore not be a high priority. What is more, some may even consider that by recalling the past, they will reopen old wounds that would have otherwise faded away with time.

Experience has shown, however, that addressing the scars of the past is the best way to guarantee that the crimes of the past do not happen again. The most successful reconciliation efforts have been those where governments have, at some risk and against the odds, made a genuine attempt to confront past abuses.

These thoughts were in the back of the minds of African parliamentarians who participated in the Regional seminar on the role of parliaments in national reconciliation in Africa, held in Bujumbura from 7 to 9 November 2005.

The painful history of the seminar's host country, Burundi, epitomizes the hardship that comes with conflict. Today, the country is at a crossroads.

Presidential and legislative elections in 2005 have radically changed its political landscape. Significant strides have been made in securing peace, though fighting still continues in some parts of the country. The new authorities have expressed their commitment to uncovering the truth of the past. Discussions are under way to define the parameters of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).

The difficult decisions that Burundians now face served as a starting point for much of the debate on the use of transitional justice mechanisms for reconciliation, which, in addition to truth commissions, may also include trials, reparation programmes for victims and institutionalreform. Members of parliament everywhere in Africa are ideally placed to initiate a nationaldebate to identify the right mix of these mechanisms that would serve the reconciliation process in their own countries.

While according to the participants in this event TRCs can indeed make an essential contribution to reconciliation, their success is not guaranteed. There are many pitfalls and questions to be answered, the first of which concerns the timing for the creation of such a commission. Will its establishment unify, or divide? Are the former rulers capable of frustrating the entire exercise, including by putting those who choose to tell the truth at risk? Will the new authorities use the commission to take revenge? What kind of truth is being sought? Which period of abuse should the commission look into? How can the authorities make sure that the TRC's creation and work is a nationwide endeavour, and is supported by all?

When providing reparation to victims, there is the challenge of determining appropriate compensation. In the event of massive violations, how does the State provide redress, and how does it obtain the required resources? In discussing the option of prosecuting perpetrators of abuses, the magnitude of the violations makes it sometimes impossible for the ordinary justice system to respond. The use of gacaca courts in Rwanda aims to provide an answer to this challenge and has the advantage of involving society in the administration of justice at the grassroots level. The pursuit of justice also raises another important question. Where should it take place? In principle, a justice system which is close to those whom it is meant to serve is preferable. However, often the national justice system is very weak and cannot live up to its responsibility to dispense justice. The International Criminal Court or a hybrid nationalinternational tribunal could then offer an alternative

The summary and recommendations of the seminar may be found on its dedicated web page

Building capacity for the sustainable management of water resources: Regional seminar for Arab parliaments

Members of parliament from the Arab region who participated in the seminar. Building on a partnership now well into its second year, the IPU and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) in cooperation with the Arab Inter-Parliamentary Union and at the invitation of the National Assembly of Lebanon, kicked off the first of a series of regional seminars on sustainable development issues on 29 and 30 November 2005 in Beirut.

The focus of the seminar reflected the important stakes involved in water issues in the Arab region. Indeed, water has been identified as one of the greatest potential sources of future conflicts. The Beirut seminar provided legislators and parliamentary staff from 13 parliaments in the Arab region with the opportunity to discuss and exchange experiences on the vital role parliament can play in improving the management of water resources, with a view to ensuring their sustainability, including through the development of sound national legislation. Participants learned of innovative experiences in the management of scarce water resources in the region. Furthermore, in addition to spreading understanding of parliaments' oversight role over government water management activities, the seminar served as a forum to promote awareness among parliamentarians of the need to ensure better representation of citizens in respect of water issues at the global level.

 

 HOME PAGE | MAIN AREAS OF ACTIVITY | STRUCTURE AND DOCUMENTS 

 
Copyright © 2006 Inter-Parliamentary Union