| Alberto Perdomo Gamarra ( M) |
| Marti Dalgalarrondo ( M) |
Asamblea General
Palacio Legislativo,
Avenida de las Leyes s/n
Montevideo
URUGUAY
Tel.: (598 2) 924 86 86, 924 81 19
Fax: (598 2) 924 87 74
E-mail: ipuuru@parlamento.gub.uy
| http://www.parlamento.gub.uy |
| http://www.diputados.gub.uy/ |
1985 -
Vacancies arising between general elections are filled by substitutes elected at the same time as the titular members.
Voting is compulsory, unjustified abstention being punishable by a fine.
- Uruguayan citizenship
- presence in country on polling day
- disqualifications: mental illness, conviction for criminal offence
- Uruguayan citizenship by birth or naturalization for at least 5 years
- full possession of civil rights
- prosecuting attorneys
- police officials
- directors of national companies
- members of the armed forces on active duty
Also available:
Archive of past election results for this chamber
Pre-election polls predicted a first-round triumph for Mr Tabaré Vázquez, the presidential candidate of the Broad Front coalition (Encuentro Progresista/Frente Amplio/Nueva Mayoría), which was created in 1971 and comprised the traditional reformist left (including the Communist Party), the former Tupamaros urban guerrillas and other left-wing groups together with some politicians who had abandoned the two traditional parties, the National and Colorado parties.
In the case Mr Vázquez failed to take the 50 percent plus one vote needed to win the elections outright, his rival in the 28 November run-off was expected to be Mr Jorge Larrañaga, the candidate of the centre-right National Party, whose poll ratings ranged between 30 and 35 per cent. All opinion polls predicted the poorest showing ever by the Colorado Party, whose candidate, Mr Guillermo Stirling, former Interior Minister in the outgoing Batlle administration, had just eight to eleven per cent poll ratings.
The Colorado Party, which had ruled the country for most of its existence as an independent republic since 1830, also governed during three of the four presidential terms since the end of the 1973-1985 military dictatorship, twice under former president Julio María Sanguinetti and once under Mr Batlle. According to analysts, at the 2004 elections, the two traditional parties were paying the cost of the alliance formed in the 1990s to push through their neo-liberal economic policies that led to the financial and economic collapse of 2002. The neo-liberal economic doctrine of market-oriented policy measures, liberalisation, deregulation, privatisation and structural adjustments known as the "Washington Consensus" began to be applied throughout Latin America in the 1990s on the prescription of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the U.S. government.
During the campaign, Mr Vázquez Vázquez had announced he would strengthen Uruguay's commitment and ties to Mercosur (Southern Common Market). He called for a larger and reorganised Mercosur that would be better able to both coordinate South-South cooperation and conduct negotiations for a Free Trade Area of the Americas, relations with the European Union, India, China, and various integration processes, as well as its participation in multi-lateral forums like the World Trade Organisation. That would stand in sharp contrast to the focus of conservative outgoing President Jorge Batlle, who had put a priority on relations with the United States and strengthened his friendship with the family of President George W Bush, while pushing relations with neighbouring countries to the backburner or even undermining normally strong ties with Argentina and Brazil, which had been hurt by a number of diplomatic rows. During his mandate, Mr. Batlle represented one of the Bush administration's most loyal supporters in Latin America, supporting the war on Iraq, despite polls showing 90 per cent of the population opposed it, and sending peacekeeping troops to Haiti as well as backing the US bid to isolate Cuba.
Mr Vázquez, who had run for president twice and lost, had accumulated popularity by calling for greater transparency and efficiency in government, respect for human rights and more comprehensive social programmes to alleviate the recent increase in poverty. Like his opponents, he had promised to respect the terms of the debt restructuring and respecting the country's programme with the International Monetary Fund. In this campaign, the left put a strong emphasis on calming the financial markets and business sector, announcing far ahead of the elections the name of the future economy minister: Senator Danilo Astori, a prestigious Broad Front economist who has a reputation as a moderate.
The results showed that the Frente Amplio coalition would rule the country for the first time. Mr. Tabaré Vázquez won almost 52 per cent of the popular vote for President, thereby avoiding a runoff. The Colorado Party won a historically low vote total of 10 per cent, the worst election results ever for this party.
The Frente Amplio coalition will control 17 of the 30 Senate seats and 53 of the 99 seats in the House of Representatives. Though the National Blanco Party presidential candidate did not make it to the runoff, the party nevertheless polled more than in the previous elections winning more Senate and House of Representatives seats, 10 senators and 34 representatives. The Colorado Party obtained three seats in the Senate and only 10 in the House of Representatives, down from 33.
| Round no 1 (31 October 2004): Election results | ||||
| Number of registered electors | 2'487'816 | |||
| Voters | 2'229'583 (89.62%) | |||
| Blank or invalid ballot papers | 52'414 | |||
| Valid votes | 2'177'169 | |||
| Round no 1: Distribution of votes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Political Group | Candidates | Votes | % of votes | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Progressive Encounter - Broad Front - New Majority (E.P.F.A.N.M.) | 1'124'761 | 51.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| National (Blanco) Party | 764'739 | 35.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado Party | 231'036 | 10.61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Independents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Round no 1: Distribution of seats | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Political Group | Total of seats | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progressive Encounter - Broad Front - New Majority (E.P.F.A.N.M.) | 53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| National (Blanco) Party | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado Party | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Independents | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources:
- El País Uruguay
- IFES
- Chamber of Representatives (01.01.2008)
- for the first year of the five-year term of the legislature, the Speaker occupies the post from 15 February until the end of February of the next year;
- for the rest of the legislature, the Speaker occupies the post from 1 March until the end of February of the next year.
Reasons of interruption of the term: resignation, death, dissolution of the Chamber
- the election is held at the beginning of every annual session
- before validation of mandates
- a simple majority of the Members is required
- the Secretary supervises the voting
- the Secretary announces the results without delay
- the results cannot be challenged
- in the absence of the Speaker, one of the four Vice-Presidents elected using the same procedure as the President can assume his/her role and functions
- expense allowance
- official car
- secretariat
- establishes and modifies the agenda
- organizes the debates
- examines the admissibility of bills and amendments
- refers texts to a committee for study
- examines the admissibility of requests for setting up committees of enquiry, proposes or decides on the setting-up of such committees
- is empowered to appoint committees and their presidents
- ensures respect for provisions of the Constitution and Standing Orders
- takes disciplinary measures in the event of disturbance, and lifts such measures
- establishes the list of speakers, gives and withdraws permission to speak
- verifies the voting procedure
- checks the quorum at the indication of the Secretary
- authenticates the texts adopted and the records of debates with the Secretaries of the Chambers
- interprets the rules or other regulations governing the life of the Chamber
- recruits, assigns and promotes staff with the agreement of the Committee for Chamber Affairs and the Secretariat
- organizes the services of Parliament
- is responsible for relations with foreign Parliaments
- is responsible for safety, and in this capacity, can call in the police in the event of disturbance in the Chamber
- gives directives for the interpretation or completion of the text under discussion
- takes part in voting
- proposes bills or amendments
- intervenes in the parliamentary oversight procedure
- transmits laws to the Head of State for promulgation
· Procedure (Art. 326 and 327 of the Constitution, Art. 158 to 165 of the Electoral Law)
· Procedure (Art. 115 (3) of the Constitution) (see also Pension scheme)
· Authority competent to accept the resignation: the Chamber of Representatives
1. By the Chamber of Representatives:
- Exclusion (Art. 115 (2) of the Constitution, see also Code of conduct)
2. By both Chambers:
- Impeachment (Art. 93, 102 and 103 of the Constitution, see also Code of conduct)
1. The members of the Board
2. The Vice-Presidents of the Chamber of Representatives
3. The Presidents of the Committees, for certain acts or ceremonies
4. The other MPs
· Basic salary (see also Art. 117 of the Constitution): U$ 40,000 (US$ 4,000)
· No exemption from tax
· Pension scheme (Art. 77 (2) No. 10, and 111 (1) of the Constitution)
· Other facilities:
(a) Secretariat
(b) Assistants (Art. 107 of the Constitution, Rules 96 to 103 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly, Rules 106 (2) No. 15, and 109 to 113 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
(c) Postal and telephone services
(d) Travel: when decided by the Chamber of Representatives
· Parliamentary non-accountability applies to words spoken and written by MPs both within and outside Parliament.
· Derogations: waiver of immunity, offence or insult (Rules 73, 104 (H), and 106 (2) No. 6 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives, see Discipline)
· Non-accountability takes effect on the day when the mandate begins.
· It applies to criminal and civil proceedings, covers all offences with the exception of traffic offences, and protects MPs from arrest and from being held in preventive custody, from the opening of judicial proceedings against them and from their homes being searched.
· Derogations: in cases of flagrante delicto, the MP can be arrested. Notice shall immediately be given to the Chamber of Representatives, with a summary report of the case.
· Parliamentary inviolability does not prevent MPs from being called as witnesses before a judge or tribunal. However, they may reply in writing, without appearing before a judge or tribunal.
· Protection is provided from the start to the end of the mandate, including between early dissolution of the House and the election of a new Parliament, and also covers judicial proceedings instituted against MPs before their election.
· Parliamentary immunity (inviolability) can be lifted (Art. 114 of the Constitution):
- Competent authority: the Chamber of Representatives
- Procedure (Art. 114 of the Constitution). In this case, MPs need not be heard. They do not have means of appeal.
· Parliament cannot subject the prosecution and/or detention to certain conditions.
· Parliament cannot suspend the prosecution and/or detention of one of its members.
· In the event of preventive custody or imprisonment, the MPs concerned cannot be authorised to attend sittings of Parliament.
· Penalties foreseen in case of failure to fulfil this obligation:
- Admonition (Rule 29 (2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly, Rules 37 (3) and 106 (2) No. 7 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Loss of committee membership (Rule 127 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Other penalties for non-attendance at the opening sitting of the General Assembly (Art. 109 of the Constitution)
· Body competent to judge such cases/to impose penalties:
- Admonition, loss of committee membership: the President
- Other penalties for non-attendance at the opening sitting of the General Assembly: the MPs present
· Disciplinary measures foreseen:
- Interruption (Rules 69 and 70 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Call to order (Rules 69 (1) and 73 to 74 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Warning for irrelevance (Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Prohibition to take the floor (Rule 75 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Order to withdraw (Rule 75 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Adjournment of the House, suspension of the sitting (Rule 106 (2) No. 8 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
· Specific cases:
- Offence or insult (Rules 73, 104 (H), and 106 (2) No. 6 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives): interruption, call to order
· Competent body to judge such cases/to impose penalties (Rules 105 (G) and 106 (2) No. 6 and 8 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives):
- Interruption, offence or insult: any Representative
- Call to order, warning for irrelevance, offence or insult: the President, on his own instigation or on that of another Representative; the Chamber of Representatives
- Prohibition to take the floor, order to withdraw, adjournment of the House, suspension of the sitting: the President
· Procedure:
- Interruption, offence or insult (Rules 69 and 70 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Call to order, offence or insult (Rules 69 (1) and 73 to 74, 104 (H), and 106 (2) No. 6 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Warning for irrelevance (Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Prohibition to take the floor, order to withdraw (Rule 75 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
- Adjournment of the House, suspension of the sitting (Rule 106 (2) No. 8 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Representatives)
· Penalties foreseen for violation of the rules of conduct:
- Reprimand (Art. 115 (1) of the Constitution)
- Suspension (Art. 115 (1) of the Constitution)
- Loss of mandate (Art. 115 (2) of the Constitution, exclusion)
- Loss of mandate (Art. 93, 102 and 103 of the Constitution, impeachment)
· Competent body to judge such cases/to impose penalties:
- Reprimand, suspension, loss of mandate (exclusion): the Chamber of Representatives
- Loss of mandate (impeachment): the Chamber of Representatives and the Senate
· Procedure:
- Reprimand, suspension (Art. 115 (1) of the Constitution).
- Loss of mandate (Art. 115 (2) of the Constitution, exclusion).
- Loss of mandate (Art. 93, 102 and 103 of the Constitution, impeachment). In this case, MPs have means of recourse.
Also available:
Archive of past election results for this chamber
General Information | Electoral System | Specialized Bodies
Last Elections | Presidency of the Parliament | Parliamentary Mandate | Parliamentary Oversight
PARLINE database: new search
Copyright © 1996-2008 Inter-Parliamentary Union