Use case ID: 005
Author: IT Department, Chamber of Deputies of Italy
Date: 22 May 2024
Objective:
Generate evidence about which amendments are similar to each other and the degree of similarity between them.
Actors:
- Business units
- Dossier of amendments
Prerequisites:
- Amendments stored in a structured way inside a database
- Dossier of amendments stored in a content management system
Scenario:
- The amendments are submitted by MPs, received by offices, stored in a structured way inside a database, numbered according to presentation time and ordered according to voting order.
- The dossier of amendments is produced and stored in a structured way (i.e. JSON format).
- The similarity algorithm, based on semantic distance computation, is executed. For each amendment, it returns a list of amendments having a similarity score higher than a predetermined threshold. The similarity score is also shown for each item in the list.
- The business units keep working on the dossier of amendments (legislative drafting and inadmissibility speeches), with evidence of similarities between amendments.
Expected results:
- It takes less time to manage the dossier of amendments (i.e. the writing of inadmissibility speeches).
- A situation where amendments that have similar content are managed differently is avoided.
Potential challenges:
- There could be a few false positives; human checks are therefore needed.
Data requirements:
- Structured representation of the dossier of amendments (i.e. JSON format)
- Amendment texts and metadata stored inside a database
Integrations with other systems:
- Database containing amendment texts and metadata
- Software application used for legislative drafting and for other procedural tasks on amendments
Success metrics:
- Time needed to write inadmissibility speeches
- Improved response time in terms of identifying similar amendments
- Colleague satisfaction scores
The Use cases for AI in parliaments collection is published by the IPU’s Centre for Innovation in Parliament as part of the Parliamentary Data Science Hub’s project to create guidelines for AI governance in parliaments. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence. It may be freely shared and reused with acknowledgement of the author and the IPU. A use case describes how a system should work. It is used to plan, develop and measure implementation. A use case is not the same as a case study, which is a descriptive text of an actual project’s implementation. Please note that this use case is provided “as is” and neither the IPU nor the author accepts any responsibility for its use. For more information about the IPU’s work on artificial intelligence, please visit www.ipu.org/AI or contact [email protected]. |