Skip to main content

Drafting of amendments to legislative texts

Italy - Senate

Use case ID: 038

Author: Senate of Italy

Date: 12 June 2024 

Objective:

Assist parliamentary staff in drafting amendments to legislative texts, utilizing artificial intelligence (AI)-powered large language models (LLMs) to ensure accuracy, consistency and compliance with legislative standards.

Actors:

  • Parliamentary staff members
  • Legislative drafting committee
  • IT support team

Prerequisites:

  • Access to trained AI LLM models familiar with legislative language and structure
  • Integration with legislative drafting and document management systems
  • Comprehensive database of existing legislative texts and amendments for reference
  • Adherence to legal and procedural standards for legislative drafting

Scenario:

  1. A parliamentary staff member identifies a section of a legislative text that requires an amendment.
  2. The staff member inputs the original text and the proposed changes into the AI LLM system.
  3. The AI LLM system analyses the proposed changes, ensuring they align with legal standards and legislative language.
  4. The AI LLM system generates a draft of the amendment, incorporating the proposed changes accurately.
  5. The draft amendment is reviewed by the legislative drafting committee for legal and procedural compliance.
  6. The final version of the amendment is formatted and integrated into the legislative text.
  7. The system logs the drafting activity for future reference and analysis.

Alternate flows:

  • None

Expected results:

  • Efficiency and accuracy in drafting legislative amendments are enhanced.
  • The turnaround time for drafting and reviewing amendments is shortened.
  • Resources are better allocated, allowing legal staff to focus on more complex legislative tasks.

Potential challenges:

  • Ensuring the AI LLM system maintains high accuracy in legal language and structure

Data requirements:

  • Comprehensive database of legislative texts and previous amendments
  • Legal glossaries and references to ensure accurate language and terminology
  • Historical records of legislative drafting activities 

Integrations with other systems:

  • Legislative document management system (LDMS)
  • Legal workflow automation tools
  • Secure data storage solutions
  • User authentication and access control systems

Success metrics:

  • Accuracy rate of drafted amendments
  • Average time taken to draft and review amendments
  • User satisfaction scores
  • Reduction in the backlog of amendment requests
  • Percentage of amendments requiring minimal human intervention

 

The Use cases for AI in parliaments collection is published by the IPU’s Centre for Innovation in Parliament as part of the Parliamentary Data Science Hub’s project to create guidelines for AI governance in parliaments.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence. It may be freely shared and reused with acknowledgement of the author and the IPU. 

A use case describes how a system should work. It is used to plan, develop and measure implementation. A use case is not the same as a case study, which is a descriptive text of an actual project’s implementation. Please note that this use case is provided “as is” and neither the IPU nor the author accepts any responsibility for its use.

For more information about the IPU’s work on artificial intelligence, please visit www.ipu.org/AI or contact [email protected]